Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer: 2-year patient-reported outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial
Wilkins, A., Mossop, H., Syndikus, I., Khoo, V., Bloomfield, D., Parker, C., Logue, J., Scrase, C., Patterson, H., Birtle, A., Staffurth, J., Malik, Z., Panades, M., Eswar, C., Graham, J., Russell, M., Kirkbride, P., O'Sullivan, J. M., Gao, A., Cruickshank, C., Griffin, C., Dearnaley, D., Hall, E.
(2015)
Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer: 2-year patient-reported outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial.
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 16 (16).
pp. 1605-1616.
ISSN 1470-2045
|
Text
14668.pdf Download (449kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) might detect more toxic effects of radiotherapy than do clinicianreported outcomes. We did a quality of life (QoL) substudy to assess PROs up to 24 months after conventionally fractionated or hypofractionated radiotherapy in the Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer (CHHiP) trial. Methods The CHHiP trial is a randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial done in 71 centres, of which 57 UK hospitals took part in the QoL substudy. Men with localised prostate cancer who were undergoing radiotherapy were eligible for trial entry if they had histologically confirmed T1b-T3aN0M0 prostate cancer, an estimated risk of seminal vesicle involvement less than 30%, prostate-specific antigen concentration less than 30 ng/mL, and a WHO performance status of 0 or 1. Participants were randomly assigned (1: 1: 1) to receive a standard fractionation schedule of 74 Gy in 37 fractions or one of two hypofractionated schedules: 60 Gy in 20 fractions or 57 Gy in 19 fractions. Randomisation was done with computer-generated permuted block sizes of six and nine, stratified by centre and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group. Treatment allocation was not masked. UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI), including Short Form (SF)-36 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), or Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and SF-12 quality-of-life questionnaires were completed at baseline, pre-radiotherapy, 10 weeks post-radiotherapy, and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-radiotherapy. The CHHiP trial completed accrual on June 16, 2011, and the QoL substudy was closed to further recruitment on Nov 1, 2009. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary endpoint of the QoL substudy was overall bowel bother and comparisons between fractionation groups were done at 24 months post-radiotherapy. The CHHiP trial is registered with ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN97182923. Findings 2100 participants in the CHHiP trial consented to be included in the QoL substudy: 696 assigned to the 74 Gy schedule, 698 assigned to the 60 Gy schedule, and 706 assigned to the 57 Gy schedule. Of these individuals, 1659 (79%) provided data pre-radiotherapy and 1444 (69%) provided data at 24 months after radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 50.0 months (IQR 38.4-64.2) on April 9, 2014, which was the most recent follow-up measurement of all data collected before the QoL data were analysed in September, 2014. Comparison of 74 Gy in 37 fractions, 60 Gy in 20 fractions, and 57 Gy in 19 fractions groups at 2 years showed no overall bowel bother in 269 (66%), 266 (65%), and 282 (65%) men; very small bother in 92 (22%), 91 (22%), and 93 (21%) men; small bother in 26 (6%), 28 (7%), and 38 (9%) men; moderate bother in 19 (5%), 23 (6%), and 21 (5%) men, and severe bother in four (< 1%), three (< 1%) and three (< 1%) men respectively (74 Gy vs 60 Gy, p(trend) = 0.64, 74 Gy vs 57 Gy, p(trend) = 0.59). We saw no differences between treatment groups in change of bowel bother score from baseline or pre-radiotherapy to 24 months. Interpretation The incidence of patient-reported bowel symptoms was low and similar between patients in the 74 Gy control group and the hypofractionated groups up to 24 months after radiotherapy. If efficacy outcomes from CHHiP show non-inferiority for hypofractionated treatments, these findings will add to the growing evidence for moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules becoming the standard treatment for localised prostate cancer.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors (ICR Faculty only): | Khoo, Vincent and Parker, Chris and Dearnaley, David and Hall, Emma |
All Authors: | Wilkins, A., Mossop, H., Syndikus, I., Khoo, V., Bloomfield, D., Parker, C., Logue, J., Scrase, C., Patterson, H., Birtle, A., Staffurth, J., Malik, Z., Panades, M., Eswar, C., Graham, J., Russell, M., Kirkbride, P., O'Sullivan, J. M., Gao, A., Cruickshank, C., Griffin, C., Dearnaley, D., Hall, E. |
Additional Information: | ISI Document Delivery No.: CX6IF Times Cited: 0 Cited Reference Count: 25 Wilkins, Anna Mossop, Helen Syndikus, Isabel Khoo, Vincent Bloomfield, David Parker, Chris Logue, John Scrase, Christopher Patterson, Helen Birtle, Alison Staffurth, John Malik, Zafar Panades, Miguel Eswar, Chinnamani Graham, John Russell, Martin Kirkbride, Peter O'Sullivan, Joe M. Gao, Annie Cruickshank, Clare Griffin, Clare Dearnaley, David Hall, Emma Cancer Research UK [CRUK/06/16, C8262/A7253, C1491/A9895, C1491/A15955, SP2312/021]; Department of Health, the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network, and NHS; Institute of Cancer Research, London This work was supported by Cancer Research UK (CRUK/06/16, C8262/A7253, C1491/A9895, C1491/A15955, SP2312/021), the Department of Health, the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network, and NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London. We thank the patients, investigators, physicists, radiographers, and research support staff at the participating centres (appendix). We recognise the role of all the trials unit staff at Bob Champion Unit and at ICR-CTSU who contributed to the central coordination of the study. We would also like to thank the CHHiP Trial Management Group members, past and present, and the Independent Data Monitoring and Trial Steering Committees for overseeing the trial. Helen Patterson died in 2012 shortly after completion of recruitment to the trial and remains greatly missed by her colleagues. 0 Elsevier science inc New york 1474-5488 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | quality-of-life conformal radiotherapy acute toxicity men index reliability validation instrument survivors validity Oncology |
Research teams: | ICR divisions > Clinical Studies > ICR-CTSU Urology and Head and Neck Trials Team ICR divisions > Radiotherapy and Imaging > Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Dearnaley) Clinical Units > Urology Unit |
Depositing User: | Franziska Noessig |
Date Deposited: | 04 Jan 2016 09:51 |
Last Modified: | 05 Jan 2016 11:37 |
URI: | http://publications.icr.ac.uk/id/eprint/14668 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |