Making the discoveries that defeat cancer

  • Home »
  • Research »
  • Repository

  • Administrators Login

  • Repository Homepage
  • About the Repository
  • Browse the Repository
  • Search the Repository
  • Contribute an Article
  • Missing Publications
  • Repository Help

Aesthetic and oncologic outcomes after one-stage immediate breast reconstruction using a permanent biodimensional expandable implant

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Agusti, A., Ward, A., Montgomery, C., Mohammed, K., Gui, G. P. H. (2016) Aesthetic and oncologic outcomes after one-stage immediate breast reconstruction using a permanent biodimensional expandable implant. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 69 (2). pp. 211-220. ISSN 1748-6815

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Introduction: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with implants is the commonest method of reconstructive surgery after mastectomy. With careful patient selection, a stable implant pocket can be created at the primary operation to decrease the likelihood of further surgery to adjust the reconstructed side. One-stage IBR is cost effective but failed procedures requiring early revision may be costly as permanent expanders are expensive. Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all women undergoing a planned one-stage immediate breast reconstruction between 1997 and 2010. All patients had a Style 150 implant (Allergan, Marlow, UK). Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier plots and, where applicable, Cox Proportional Hazards Regression was used to compare outcomes between groups. Results: 249 planned one-stage IBRs were performed in 193 women, median age 45 years (range 20-77) with median follow-up of 101 months (range 27-159 months). 18/193 (9%) patients required implant exchange at 12 months and 66% of patients maintained their original implants at the time of census. Implant assisted latissimus appears to be robust even when radiotherapy was delivered. Disease free survival and breast cancer mortality were as expected for the breast cancer stage treated. Conclusion: With careful patient selection, one-stage implant IBR using a definitive anatomical expandable implant provides good long term reconstruction and safe oncologic outcome. Direct to implant decision algorithms may be influenced by future developments in acellular dermal matrix technology, but the ability to create a single-stage stable implant pocket with good surgical technique should not be forgotten. (C) 2015 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
All Authors: Agusti, A., Ward, A., Montgomery, C., Mohammed, K., Gui, G. P. H.
Additional Information: ISI Document Delivery No.: DD3RM Times Cited: 0 Cited Reference Count: 27 Agusti, A. Ward, A. Montgomery, C. Mohammed, K. Gui, G. P. H. 0 Elsevier sci ltd Oxford 1878-0539
Uncontrolled Keywords: Skin-sparing mastectomy Immediate breast reconstruction One-stage implant reconstruction Biodimensional anatomical implants Expandable implants Cancer recurrence patient satisfaction cancer patients Surgery
Research teams: Clinical Units > Academic Surgery
Depositing User: Franziska Noessig
Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2016 19:03
Last Modified: 16 Mar 2016 11:30
URI: http://publications.icr.ac.uk/id/eprint/14847

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
The Royal Marsden - NHS foundation trust