Making the discoveries that defeat cancer

  • Home »
  • Research »
  • Repository

  • Administrators Login

  • Repository Homepage
  • About the Repository
  • Browse the Repository
  • Search the Repository
  • Contribute an Article
  • Missing Publications
  • Repository Help

Men's decision-making about predictive BRCA1/2 testing: the role of family

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C,. Watson, M. (2005) Men's decision-making about predictive BRCA1/2 testing: the role of family. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 14 (3). pp. 207-217. ISSN 1059-7700

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Men who have a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer may be offered a predictive genetic test to determine whether or not they carry the family specific BRCA1/2 mutation. Male carriers may be at increased risk of breast and prostate cancers. Relatively little is known about at-risk men's decision-making about BRCA1/2 testing. This qualitative study explores the influences on male patients' genetic test decisions. Twenty-nine in-depth interviews were undertaken with both carrier and noncarrier men and immediate family members (17 male patients, 8 female partners, and 4 adult children). These explored family members' experiences of cancer and genetic testing, decision-making about testing, family support, communication of test results within the family, risk perception and risk management. Implicit influences on men's testing decisions such as familial obligations are examined. The extent to which other family members--partners and adult children--were involved in testing decisions is also described. It is demonstrated that mothers of potential mutation carriers not only perceive themselves as having a right to be involved in making this decision, but also were perceived by their male partners as having a legitimate role to play in decision-making. There was evidence that (adult) children were excluded from the decision-making, and some expressed resentment about this. The implications of these findings for the practice of genetic counseling are discussed.

Item Type: Review Article
Authors (ICR Faculty only): Eeles, Rosalind and Watson, Maggie
All Authors: Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C,. Watson, M.
Research teams: ICR divisions > Genetics and Epidemiology > Oncogenetics
ICR divisions > Radiotherapy and Imaging > Oncogenetics

Closed research groups > Psychology Research Group
Depositing User: Users 10 not found.
Date Deposited: 09 Oct 2008 14:46
Last Modified: 29 Apr 2016 14:53
URI: http://publications.icr.ac.uk/id/eprint/7021

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
The Royal Marsden - NHS foundation trust